|
New CMT Codes 98940,
98941, 98942 (January 1997)
The hoopla of the new year is over along with the hoopla of
the new CPT codes for chiropractic. After the party dies down, the implications of these
codes will stay with us. The question is: will they be a monster hangover? From one
perspective, it is wonderful to not have to use codes designed for physical therapy or
osteopathy. As a profession, we have codes designed to describe our procedures. The
operative question is this: what did we lose in the process? Lets first look at the
definitions of the codes themselves.
As of January 1, 1997, new procedure codes for adjustments
(manipulations) will take effect. These codes, patterned after the osteopathic
manipulation codes released in 1996, break the spine down into five distinct regions. For
purposes of CMT, the five spinal regions referred to are:
1. cervical region (includes atlanto-occipital joint)
2. thoracic region (includes costovertebral and
costotransverse joints)
3. lumbar region
4. sacral region
5. pelvic region (includes sacroiliac joint)
The CMT code you choose depends on the number of regions
adjusted by the doctor. Notice, the code reads regions not vertebrae. Even if the doctor
adjusts C1, C2 and C7, only one region cervical has been adjusted. The codes
are as follows:
98940 Chiropractic manipulative treatment (CMT); spinal,
one to two regions
98941 spinal, three to four regions
98942 spinal, five regions
98943 CMT, extraspinal, one or more regions
There are also five extraspinal regions:
1. head (including temporomandibular joint)
2. lower extremities
3. upper extremities
4. rib cage
5. abdomen
Determining which code to use: If the doctor adjusts only
upper cervical, the appropriate code would be 98940. When the doctor adjusts full spine
(cervical, thoracic and lumbar), you could use 98941. For doctors who usually adjust full
spine, this code could be the most frequently used; from a pessimistic viewpoint, though,
your documentation requirements will undoubtedly be much stiffer since you must document
the need to adjust full spine. Theres not much doubt that the RVS (Relative Value
Scale) will be higher for 98941 than 98940. (This means you will get paid more.) On the
other hand, 98942 (five regions) will probably be used sparingly. In my opinion, 98942
will need extensive documentation. In addition to the codes for spinal manipulation, 98943
represents extremity or rib adjustments. You might encounter situations such as carpal
tunnel syndrome where the neck is adjusted along with the wrist or elbow. It would be
appropriate to use both 98940 and 98943. Likewise, if a patient is experiencing jaw (TMJ)
problems, you might manipulate the neck and the TMJ. Using both codes adequately describes
your treatment. One word of caution: make sure that the scope of practice law for your
state allows extremity adjusting before you use 98943. There are some states (Michigan,
for example) where the scope of practice law limits manipulation to the spine.
Using CMT codes and E/M codes on the same
visit
The chiropractic manipulative treatment codes include a
pre-manipulation and postservice patient assessment. According to CPT 1997,
"additional Evaluation and Management services may be reported separately using the
modifier-25, if and only if the patients condition requires a significant separately
identifiable E/M service, and above and beyond the usual preservice and postservice work
associated with the procedure." How do you interpret that statement? Heres my
interpretation: if you perform an extensive new patient exam and adjust the patient on the
first visit, you could use 99202-25 or 99203-25 in addition to the CMT code. Likewise, if
the patient experiences an exacerbation, a new injury or different symptoms, you could
justify the E/M code along with the CMT code. Otherwise, the CMT code includes the pre-
and post-adjustment exams such as palpation and leg checks that the doctor performs on an
ongoing basis.
Medicare and CMT Codes
Medicare in most states has already indicated that the new
codes will replace A2000 with a three-month grace period where A2000 will still be honored
along with the new codes. Lets look at Medicare law for clues to interpretation of
the CMT codes. "Payment of chiropractic services is limited to manual manipulation of
the spine for the purpose of correcting a subluxation demonstrated by x-ray." Since
Medicare will pay only for manipulation of the spine, 98943 would not be reimbursed even
if its use falls within the scope of practice law. Second, if you intend to use 98941 or
98942, you are almost required to shoot full spine x-rays since Medicare requires that
subluxations be demonstrated by x-ray. That's my interpretation.
While 98941 will certainly be reimbursed at a higher
relative value, there will also be added requirements.
So, are the new CMT Codes a blessing or a
curse?
Everyone has their opinion of the new codes, so heres
my opinion:
98940 if the RVS for this code matched the
osteopathic manipulation codes, Id applaud. Right now, I think the applause would
serve no purpose since we obviously dont need the air conditioning caused by
flapping arms.
Unfortunately, it seems that the osteopathic codes will be
reimbursed at a higher rate than the comparable chiropractic codes so the disparity will
continue. Because the higher level codes (98941 and 98942) will be reimbursed at a higher
level, my fear is that many chiropractors may use the higher codes when they are actually
performing the service described by 98940. I dont want to see anyone jeopardize
his/her reputation for the sake of higher reimbursement.
98941 I think many chiropractors will try to use
this code and encounter documentation problems in its use. Remember, it can only be used
if the doctor adjusts three or four regions of the spine. In my interpretation, you would
need a diagnosis and correseponding progress notes for each area; you would need
supporting documentation in terms of subjective or objective findings. Those offices who
use this code with high frequency may be painting a bullseye on their backs and asking for
an audit. I see one other problem wth 98941. If you diagnose three or four regions of the
spine, they all become pre-existing conditions. When the patient experiences a new injury
or exacerbation, it occurs in an area which was already under treatment. Rather than being
a new condition, it becomes a continuation of an underlying problem. It is unlikely that
an insurance company will buy into the scenario where there is a new injury or
exacerbation every three months for the sole purpose of justifying ongoing care.
Its your call
Probably the biggest blessing of the CMT codes is their
specificity. We have codes designated for chiropractic and no longer have to use 97260
which is a physical therapy code or 98920 which is osteopathic manipulation. With the
inherent limitations and implications, you decide is that a blessing? As I write
this article, Im not sure!
Contributed by: Marilyn Gard, President, Clinic Pro
Chiropractic Software, marilyn@clinicpro.com
This information provided by Clinic Pro Chiropractic Software - your key to
success in a chiropractic office.

Call us about our FREE chiropractic electronic billing: EAST (800) 351-2776
WEST (877) 351-2776
|